14 jun. OSM. RV Fonte: Pensa. Estácio – Apostila de Organização, Sistemas e Métodos. Mundo das Marcas: football strategy OSM. and have my say about how OSM engine should work in my opinion to make OSM better game . APOSTILA OSM (1). OSM for Data Preparedness in Indonesia State of OSM Indonesia: Disaster Preparedness and Community Growth Yantisa Akhadi â @hotosm. org.
|Published (Last):||26 September 2012|
|PDF File Size:||20.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.85 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
What Stefan wrote below deserves GB’s serious consideration in my view as it’s for the good of the game and benefits everyone. SOS should work with attacking formations which attempt to score and not sit back.
No team rally solely on desperately shoot on goal from all positions. Thus, it should be only deployed if those 3 midfielders are world class. It could do well against weak midfield such apostioa or since it has advantage in defence and midfield area.
It could be deployed with play wide and passing game with attacking mentality but also with counterattacking and defensive mentality a team can defend nicely with 8 men behind the ball and initiate nice counterattacks where 2 attackers up front await the ball. It can also be used with counter attacks with defensive mentality. Obviously I couldn’t cover all possible combinations but if at least some of my thoughts influence Gamebasics to improve the match engine I would be very happy.
But it can such againstor which could dominate both midfield and defence areas. Osm Course Quality Rubric. It could do well against formations with weak midfield such as or but it could have problems against formations with good attackers and stronger midfield such as, and First I’m going to suggest what tactics should be defensive and offensive generally and then I’ll comment on all available formations and what tactics should work with them.
Clenilson Osm 3p Adm. It should almost always generate high scoring games because of many attackers and weak defence.
OSM Interface Development Approach
And its bad choice against or because lone attacker will have tough time to score against that many defenders. OK folks, here it is It could work well against formations with weaker midfield,where it could dominate possession.
All materials on our website are shared by users. It could aposfila dominate any 3-men defence and also concede less goals because of strong defence on its own. SOS should not work with defensive mentality and formations such as and We are nonprofit website to share and download documents.
It shouldnt also do well against because its 4vs4 and in midfield but also attackers will have tough time to score against 5 defenders.
It should be successful against formations with less men in midfield such as, etc. If playing attacking, like in Dutch football, teams utilize on their full backs, wingers and attacker in the box who should convert those chances. Home Instruction manuals OSM.
There are teams which play attacking with long balls to reach high number of attackers such as, or But it could also odm deployed with defensive tactics and formations, for teams which play direct football and try to reach final third as quickly as possible. When playing against attacking tactics and formations, it should almost always have worse stats. But it can be bad against formations with good os such as, etc.
Three midfielders should apstila defence and provide those balls to the wings. Currently SOS works aposfila best with defensive formations and when playing defensive you apowtila not have that many shots on goal and better possession because you sit back and invite pressure from the opponent who dictates the tempo. Otherwise, playing it with weak players against formations with strong midfield, could be disastrous because one man less in midfield can be serious disadvantage. It could work with It should be really good against any 3 or men defences if it can afford good attackers.
To have a chance to shot you should pass the ball at first place. To the running of this website, we need your help to support us. If you have any questions about copyright issues, please report us to resolve them. This way apostilaa wont have many chances to shoot from reasonable distance and position, it must quickly counter and build up such position and not just shoots from 50 meters. Like I said in other thread, SOS should be solely attacking tactics because attacking teams usually shot more on goal in real life, not defending teams.
We are always happy to assist you. Strong teams only should be successful with SOS tactics because they have attacking potential to create shots on goal aposrila score. This formation could be bad choice against formations with many attackers and with long ball such asor because its defence would have serious problems with so many opponent attackers.
Now I’ll generally comment on all available tactics: It can be bad choice against other attacking formations such as apostial, etc. Even defensive teams must play direct football and try to reach reasonable distance to shoot playing on the counter, long ball or even play wide which is again counterattacking.
I will also suggest what formations and tactics should work against what. It has balanced defence, strong midfield and weak attack. Of course, everyone else is invited to contribute and help Gamebasics improving its engine to match real football better.
In order to be broken, attackers must be quality and clinical in order to score against 6 midfielders. If attackers are good, this formation could dominate formations with smaller or equal number of defenders,,all resulting in high scoring games.